The last 50ft...or so at Hamilton X

Post and comment on screen captures from the beautiful game here. Home of the monthly screenshot competition

Postby Splitpin » Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:37 pm

Working up to a comp screen, but I'll throw these in here for now....

Dougs Buggy....



Electra



C-17



C-5M in the fog...







And in the clear...check out the wind sock ....this final was "final"....poor aircraft sad.gif






FSX, VLC, REX, Hamilton X, Area 51,Team KBT, Rick Piper, Adrian Brausch
Last edited by Splitpin on Sat Nov 05, 2011 9:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Sat Nov 05, 2011 11:11 pm

Lovely Screens Marty cool.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby ardypilot » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:31 pm

That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby Splitpin » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:35 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 6 2011,12:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lovely Screens Marty cool.gif


Thanks Ian, i was just telling Mike that i did about 5 approaches in that C-5 ......even with almost 0 fuel and no payload it barely stopped . Im not sure how accurate the flight model is.

I sometimes have a guy stay here , who flew "Fred" (C-5) out of Dover, he was saying that they can fly an approach as low as 100kts, and up to about 175, and roll out in about 4,000ft...payload dependent.

36R at hamilton is i believe 7200 or so? , i cant understand why i couldn't get in 'nicely'......oh well....practice practice, Im sure you all can nail it. Getting out may be interesting, it's missing a required 1000 plus feet.

Ian that dude is back here at the end of the month, I'll bring him over....he will be impressed and may be able to add something to the archive winkyy.gif

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Nov 6 2011,2:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif

Thanks Trolly......decided to change the weather, so i couldnt see the end of the runway racing toward me unsure.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:39 pm

Reading about a Galaxy mission this morning , the C5A was power by 4X 41,000 lb thrust and required 2540 meters takeoff , was to check CHCH airport history , that stage the runway was a bit shorter than what it is today at 3250 meters , also did not mention the weights , but i would say that was the 105 tonne payload .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby dbcunnz » Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:11 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Nov 5 2011,9:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Working up to a comp screen, but I'll throw these in here for now....

Marty I hope you are going to take the frame off the one you do for the comp screen winkyy.gif laugh.gif
Image
User avatar
dbcunnz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:56 pm
Posts: 4009
Location: Blenheim New Zealand

Postby Naki » Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:00 pm

Beautiful shots ...especially the C-5/C-17 shots.
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby Splitpin » Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:22 pm

dbcunnz wrote:
QUOTE (dbcunnz @ Nov 6 2011,3:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Marty I hope you are going to take the frame off the one you do for the comp screen winkyy.gif laugh.gif


Yes sir thumbup1.gif

Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Nov 6 2011,4:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Beautiful shots ...especially the C-5/C-17 shots.


Thanks Naki....Im still in my big gray mode at the moment....just love that area 51 stuff, no so much for the flying, but they screen up really good.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Kiwia1spad » Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:18 pm

cool pics S/P... where do i get the argosy from and is it FSX Accel compatible?
Kiwia1spad
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:59 pm
Posts: 546

Postby dbcunnz » Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:03 pm

Kiwia1spad wrote:
QUOTE (Kiwia1spad @ Nov 6 2011,8:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
cool pics S/P... where do i get the argosy from and is it FSX Accel compatible?

PM me your email and I can post you a CD with the Argosy 2 textures Mt Cook HS 748 2 textures and Andover with 4 RNZAF textures
If you are interested let me know
Image
User avatar
dbcunnz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:56 pm
Posts: 4009
Location: Blenheim New Zealand

Postby deeknow » Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:09 pm

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Nov 6 2011,2:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif

As a hamiltonian I can verify that is very realistic and very familiar laugh.gif
Great pics marty
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby zkcav » Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:27 pm

Those shots remind me of winter at home ohmy.gif ...nothing like a Waikato fog.
Takeoff's are optional. Landings are mandatory.
User avatar
zkcav
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:58 pm
Posts: 401
Location: NZPM

Postby Splitpin » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:40 am

deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Nov 6 2011,9:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As a hamiltonian I can verify that is very realistic and very familiar laugh.gif
Great pics marty


Thanks deeknow , and you too zkcav ,the C-5 shots are a bit of a fantasy but i was real happy with the way they came out.....thanks again.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Rotordude » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:08 pm

QUOTE (Splitpin)
[/quote]


Strewth mate, SP that is just bitchin... Love the others but that gets the gold star... clapping.gif
Last edited by Rotordude on Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regards always
Pete
Rotordude
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 508
Location: Huntly, NZ

Postby Splitpin » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:37 pm

laugh.gif Rotor....you have a way with words...glad you like it. I really wasnt sure about that one....thanks for looking thumbup1.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:52 am

It interesting , we see 747 well not so much anymore in CHCH but you see a freighter and appear to overshadow or seem bigger , the Russian counterpart An124 not much bigger , 1988 from runway level pulls up and dose a wing over , 150 thousand people all wooooo,d and said F...ar ... out ! . smile.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Splitpin » Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:05 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 8 2011,6:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It interesting , we see 747 well not so much anymore in CHCH but you see a freighter and appear to overshadow or seem bigger , the Russian counterpart An124 not much bigger , 1988 from runway level pulls up and dose a wing over , 150 thousand people all wooooo,d and said F...ar ... out ! . smile.gif


From all accounts the C-5 is very maneuverable for such a big bird......interesting talking to a guy who flew them, when they need a top up...they push a kind of bow wave ahead, that can cause the KC's a few problems.....what a monster...just love it.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:12 am

The bigger they are the easier they are to fly , the early C5 were a little lessor due to the power rating and TF39s , the M model is a whole different beast bringing it more in line with example the Russian 124 in respect to lifting and flight .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Splitpin » Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:36 am

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 9 2011,8:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The bigger they are the easier they are to fly , the early C5 were a little lessor due to the power rating and TF39s , the M model is a whole different beast bringing it more in line with example the Russian 124 in respect to lifting and flight .

The 124 into Hamilton will be my next mission......can only try, and will make for some interesting screens winkyy.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21337
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:34 am

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Nov 11 2011,10:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The 124 into Hamilton will be my next mission......

When they first put the 124 into Richmond back in 88 , he stop so quick only to find turnoffs along the runway would not suit and had to be invited to the end , only problem you have is the turnaround s or even getting to the ramp .
Last edited by Ian Warren on Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Next

Return to Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 13 guests