100% ad-free
IslandBoy77 wrote:QUOTE (IslandBoy77 @ May 11 2012,8:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>how the silver tube moves thru the air is important, why do people even bother to upgrade from FS2000, FS2002 or FS9? Oh, that's right - prettier graphics...
Sorting a few issues last night i took a break from FSX, so back to the future WWI Ooops ... RoF had the new engine - least a better smoother run so they say , YEP for the $11plus bucks it is a lotta fun but i was also looking at the detail and ground texture , the autogeneration the effects , FSX has in a way and people forget have really done a bloody amazing job , as i got hooked further , come to realise its the fun factor and as /when you spend so much time building or changing what FSX has to offer and making it as real -
We forget the point - its also for fun so Fonterragrass and P3D
may be on to something ... again we dont see any large airports in screens yet but hey 'give a day or two'
or three
IslandBoy77 wrote:QUOTE (IslandBoy77 @ May 11 2012,7:21 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...but FSX is a dinosaur that people keep putting lipstick on to make it "look good". And you and the guys putting on the lipstick do a great job. But it's still just lipstick - the glaring visual flaws (which are far more important that any technical ones) appear to be permanent and irredeemable.
I think we agree more than you think -- I try and deal with the limitations of FSX every day. It is just a matter of semantics, the limitations I try and work around (or work with) are similar to your 'glaring visual flaws'. I suppose that the very first simulator I ever tried had glaring visual flaws (wire-frame mountains!), but I never thought of it in those terms.
But my main point is not that you are comparing apples and oranges, but comparing an apple which exists with an orange which doesn't. Even if Outerra has all the promise in the world, it is still just another vapourware at the moment.
Naki wrote:QUOTE (Naki @ May 11 2012,9:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I have to say those last pics look great....
Thank youand if no one noticed its Mt Cook in the background.
saski17 wrote:QUOTE (saski17 @ May 12 2012,10:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>One thing I think most people are failing to comprehend, is that Outerra is just an engine. The actual official game developed by the developers who are making Outerra is Anteworld. Anteworld described by Shawn, is a futuristic game where you return to civilisation, probably Earth from another planet. The major cities will be overgrown with flora, vines and what not. You need to rebuild civilisation. You already have advanced human tools to help you. So infact half of what is currently in Anteworld will be removed in the final release because it is not corresponded to the games storyline or does not fit in in anyway.
SASKI .. how old are ya .. better you return t your comics .. "You already have advanced human tools to help you." .. we will wait till we see what the next 'SIMCITY' has for ya
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ May 12 2012,10:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>SASKI .. how old are ya .. better you return t your comics .. "You already have advanced human tools to help you." .. we will wait till we see what the next 'SIMCITY' has for ya
um....
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ May 12 2012,8:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>SASKI .. how old are ya .. better you return t your comics .. "You already have advanced human tools to help you." .. we will wait till we see what the next 'SIMCITY' has for ya
Ian... Made me laugh anyway. Wouldn't thought anyone had remembered me.
"Last Login: Sep 10 2010,6:27 PM" It's been two years.Last edited by Bushmaster on Sat May 12, 2012 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Return to Other Flight Simulator Games
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests