LiveATC for NZ is back!

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby gojozoom » Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:37 pm

Hi all,

In case you're not aware LiveATC started to broadcast Auckland and Wellington Towers again!

http://www.liveatc.net/feedmap/feedmap.html

Dan
Image
User avatar
gojozoom
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:37 am
Posts: 947
Location: Wellington

Postby Splitpin » Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:11 pm

gojozoom wrote:
QUOTE (gojozoom @ Aug 26 2013,7:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi all,

In case you're not aware LiveATC started to broadcast Auckland and Wellington Towers again!

http://www.liveatc.net/feedmap/feedmap.html

Dan


Thanks Dan ... tuning in .... thumbup1.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Splitpin » Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:25 pm

Akl appears to be Ardmore , buts thats ok , will be good during the day.
Last edited by Splitpin on Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby AlisterC » Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:20 pm

Cheers for the heads up. Listening now as I cross the Tasman back to NZQN smile.gif
Image
User avatar
AlisterC
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:13 am
Posts: 2543
Location: Nelson, NZ

Postby Mith18 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:57 am

Huh, the CAA is letting people repeat radio transmission now? Or do they have some sort of permit?
Mith18
Member
 
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:51 pm
Posts: 49
Location: NZNR

Postby J7G » Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:05 am

I thought it was up to Airways, not CAA?
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Postby huff3r » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:27 pm

J7G wrote:
QUOTE (J7G @ Aug 27 2013,2:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought it was up to Airways, not CAA?


Nope, it's a CAR (Civil Aviation Rule) that makes it illegal to record, or rebroadcast, or even listen to and act on information in a transmission not destined for you.
huff3r
Member
 
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:17 pm
Posts: 121

Postby Mith18 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:41 pm

J7G wrote:
QUOTE (J7G @ Aug 27 2013,2:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought it was up to Airways, not CAA?


I'm not sure the governing body it is to be honest lol. I was just going off what was said in my Flight Radio book. How you're not allowed to disclose any information about radio transmissions.
Mith18
Member
 
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:51 pm
Posts: 49
Location: NZNR

Postby J7G » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:53 pm

huff3r wrote:
QUOTE (huff3r @ Aug 27 2013,12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nope, it's a CAR (Civil Aviation Rule) that makes it illegal to record, or rebroadcast, or even listen to and act on information in a transmission not destined for you.


Redundant rule really, there's already legislation around that.
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Postby SA227 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:49 am

It is a breach of the radio communications act, nothing to do with CAA or Airways.

The appropriate people have been alerted
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 368

Postby J7G » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:01 am

Well it is if they gave permission for that transmission to be broadcast. They never want to come to the party, however, even though there's no real reason not to let people do it.
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:09 am

Well if we renamed the forum the NZFF-GCBS we'd be able to listen into anything ninja.gif ..... set of rules for some people and set of rules for others rolleyes.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby J7G » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:10 am

You've been pulled into the hype around that legislation Ian. It doesn't allow wholesale snooping on people, just support for legally sanctioned warrants.
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:50 am

J7G wrote:
QUOTE (J7G @ Aug 28 2013,11:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You've been pulled into the hype around that legislation Ian.

Bugger , means i'll have to turn off my radio , one i use that i'm not suppose to use .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby HamiltonWest » Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:31 pm

SA227 wrote:
QUOTE (SA227 @ Aug 28 2013,9:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It is a breach of the radio communications act, nothing to do with CAA or Airways.

The appropriate people have been alerted

A problem they might have with enforcing that is?, is it that it being rebroadcast from offshore which is not governed by NZ law Hence they aren't breaking any laws in NZ, they may need to ask liveatc very nicely to remove the feeds instead of the usual threats from NZALPA to take them to court?.
Last edited by HamiltonWest on Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HamiltonWest
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:15 pm
Posts: 4170
Location: HAMILTON NZ

Postby J7G » Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:29 pm

Why do NZALPA care?
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Postby cowpatz » Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:51 pm

It is quite clearly a breach of the Radio Communications act Section 133A unless LiveATC has permission to re-broadcast the transmissions. Being VHF (and therefore of limited range) the interception is taking place locally and this is where the breach of the law is occurring.

NZALPA care because the breach of law affects their membership (being controllers and pilots). It is all to easy to take or to use communication exchanges out of context and therefore misrepresent a situation.

As for the GCSB amendment if it is enough to wind up the NZ law society then it should be reason enough for us all to be concerned. Honest John's assurances just don't cut the mustard.
The fact this whole thing is getting thru with the assistance of 2 dodgy MP's (1 without even a registered party at the time and himself not willing to disclose the contents of his emails claiming privacy) smacks of arrogance and the railroading through of unsound legislation.
Last edited by cowpatz on Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Charl » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:01 pm

Well I'm quite innocent in this, and as long as it's there I'll use it!
When I have an airport scenery to explore, I load up
  • My Favourite Helicopter
  • Real World time and season at the airport
  • Real World Weather
  • Live ATC

and go practice my hovering skills.
Real as it gets, and totally immersive.

Last edited by Charl on Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:04 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Aug 28 2013,5:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As for the GCSB amendment if it is enough to wind up the NZ law society then it should reason enough for us all all to be concerned. Honest John's assurances just don't cut the mustard.
The fact this whole thing is getting thru with the assistance of 2 dodgy MP's (1 without even a registered party at the time and himself not willing to disclose the contents of his emails claiming privacy) smacks of arrogance and the railroading through unsound legislation.

One thing i did do was a TV3 vote against it ' GCSB' bill - simply to see the numbers against it - best part be interesting if it gets past , I've nothing to hide and far as Donkey is concerned .... Over here harhar.gif .... like any govt dipstick the Donkey "do you no who i am" E OR with a smirk sleep1.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby J7G » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:07 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Aug 28 2013,4:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
NZALPA care because the breach of law affects their membership (being controllers and pilots). It is all to easy to take or to use communication exchanges out of context and therefore misrepresent a situation.


The media already have scanner banks running, if anyone is going to misrepresent a situation will it be:

A. The guy listening in on a steam or

B. The guy who has the job of misrepresenting situations and already has access to the broadcasts anyway?
User avatar
J7G
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:49 pm
Posts: 449

Next

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests