FSX - as a physics engine

A place to converse about the general aspects of flight simulation in New Zealand

Postby gojozoom » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:09 pm

Hi guys,

Those of you who are familiar with Fist Person Shooters know that every couple of years a new game comes out, using a new engine, that would become the next favorite engine that another set of games will use (ie Unreal Tournament, Counter Strike).

Well, to me, it seems like FSX is getting reduced into a bare physics engine. Most of its "internals" are getting bypassed/replaced by developers:

Ground and sky environment by ORBX, Real Environment Extreme, and many others
Feel and sound by A2A, TSS and many others
System simulations by PMDG, A2A and many others
ATC by RadarContact, ProATC/X and many others
Weather systems by Active Sky (similar to A2A, they're implementing an external engine called "AS Connect Module" - read this), OPUS, and many others

So what's left? A physics engine, nothing else really. Even that might be replaced soon too. We're not even realizing but we're getting a brand new flight simulator here smile.gif

Dan
Last edited by gojozoom on Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
gojozoom
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:37 am
Posts: 947
Location: Wellington

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:30 pm

Yeah missed adding the Wobbly seats ... little whiles back use to happen natrual , guess that free to try before buy unsure.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby ardypilot » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:40 pm

Does anyone here use OPUS or know how it compares with REX weather for NZ?
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:48 pm

That Active Sky Next looks incredible. Amazing features.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3747

Postby Dean » Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:28 pm

Interesting thought....

Perhaps more interesting is the fact that the most important "missing" parts of FSX are already in X-Plane (a far more accurate physics model and 64-bit code). Food for thought? smile.gif
Image
Dean Bielanowski
Manager - PC Aviator Australia
The Flight Simulation Company!
Retailing Sim DVD Software, Downloads, Hardware and Accessories
Online Store: http://www.pcaviator.com.au/store
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dean
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:54 am
Posts: 576
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Kelvinr » Wed Sep 18, 2013 7:04 pm

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Sep 18 2013,3:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does anyone here use OPUS or know how it compares with REX weather for NZ?


I have used OPUS but I do think after some tests and comparisons that FS Global Real Weather displays better weather IMHO. At least it is sold that way. With OPUS you have to have flight sim installed on both computers to even run it via network if you wanted to. FSGRW has it done nice and clean, it has a network bridge excecutable that is in a folder with a bunch of dll's, this folder just needs to be on the FSX/Prepar3d machine and have the FSGRW installed on the non-FSX machine. Run the network bridge file on the main FSX machine and open the app on the client machine and your away laughing.

K.
--------------------------------------
User avatar
Kelvinr
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 904


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests