AirNZ 733s - the exit begins?

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby ZKNBA » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:45 pm

Most of Air New Zealand's 737s are leased. Therefore it will be the lessors who will place Air New Zealand's 737s with new owners.

From what I have been told Air NZ has been short of a CFM56 since ZK-NGD had this incident in May (http://bit.ly/qCQlPP). For the interim an engine was 'borrowed' from another 737 which was about to undergo a D check and installed on ZK-NGD. When the 737 came out of the D check it needed a new engine so Air NZ bought ZK-NGF from the lessor 'borrowed' an engine and has since parted her out.

On another note i'm really happy the 737s are being replaced with A320s. While i still like the 737s (their interiors are much better than most other 737 operators), they were getting old and in need of replacement. The new domestic A320s have really nice interiors (http://bit.ly/pNzcwi) (http://bit.ly/rfpycN), the seats are really comfortably and I always notice the extra 18cm of cabin width tongue.gif

I hope Air New Zealand's remaining 737s find good homes and will spend much more time airborne.
ZKNBA
Member
 
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 38
Location: NZNE

Postby cowpatz » Wed Sep 21, 2011 5:31 pm

raddragon wrote:
QUOTE (raddragon @ Sep 19 2011,9:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
....... I tell you what was dumb though, the fact they brought an aeroplane they cannot turn around in the usual 30 mins. The main reason for the A320s long domestic turnaround is the hot brakes. The only way around this is a brake cooling kit – imagine all that extra fuel burn!


Although brake cooling can be an issue at times this is not what is limiting turnaround time. They just cannot unload and load in the required time.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby benwynn » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:48 am

Believe part of the reason with the A320 turnaround time is the fact that A320s use pallets rather than just loading bags into the cargo hold.
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN

Postby SA227 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:23 pm

QUOTE
Believe part of the reason with the A320 turnaround time is the fact that A320s use pallets rather than just loading bags into the cargo hold[/quote]
Correct, back when I worked for Air NZ we used the 767 domestically every day. The time it took to turn the aircraft round was dictated by the time it took to get the containers off and on the aircraft.
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 368

Postby deeknow » Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:45 pm

Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby towerguy » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:19 am

give me a boeing any day

cleared immediate take off and they push the levers and go
airbus - it's type type blast ctrl alt del reset retype and wait by then the b1900 on final is midway down the circuit after the go round!

its a flying eftpos machine

Essentially french total piece of sh1t
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby Ian Warren » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:45 am

towerguy wrote:
QUOTE (towerguy @ Jun 7 2013,11:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
give me a boeing any day

cleared immediate take off and they push the levers and go
airbus - it's type type blast ctrl alt del reset retype and wait by then the b1900 on final is midway down the circuit after the go round!

its a flying eftpos machine

Essentially french total piece of sh1t

May i save this quote as my own biggrin.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby NZ255 » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:14 pm

towerguy wrote:
QUOTE (towerguy @ Jun 7 2013,10:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
give me a boeing any day

cleared immediate take off and they push the levers and go
airbus - it's type type blast ctrl alt del reset retype and wait by then the b1900 on final is midway down the circuit after the go round!

its a flying eftpos machine

Essentially french total piece of sh1t

What happens if you have a slow AC taking off and a fast AC approaching, (or vice versa) the AC on final has to go around then the AC takes off into the path?

Or do you not let it get that far?
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby towerguy » Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:57 am

"What happens if you have a slow AC taking off and a fast AC approaching, (or vice versa) the AC on final has to go around then the AC takes off into the path?

Or do you not let it get that far? "

That's why we do the training and so few get through.

All is weather and individual situation dependent - each has so many variables its hard to give a set answer as to what would happen - yes there are standard procedures but they can all be mixed and matched depending on the situation ie is the weather above or below circling, the types and speeds of the aircraft, what aids are/are not working, who is on radar down south, have i just sat down after two weeks on leave or am I three weeks in and in the zone, which airline is it and what are their SOPs, why is he going around, is the guy/girl okay or an assh0le?
Put it all in the mix and come up with an action to take - you have 3 seconds - and remember - it will be dissected and pulled apart word by word and action by action in a courtroom by people who have no clue about aviation, and also if you do it well enough it will be on the news, in the paper, and all over youtube. No Pressure.

We do try not to let it get that far, but we also should/do know what to do if it does go there - and it has before now.

You should sign up and give it a go. It's actually a really good job.
Sure as sh1t beats working for a living.
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby cowpatz » Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:34 am

It will be even more fun with reduced runway separation and conditional clearances to shortly come into effect at NZAA.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby towerguy » Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:13 pm

fun -yeah right.
still a few snags I can foresee, to be watched out for and ironed out. The missed approach area especially.
I think I'll still be running pretty conservatively for quite a while. (once I get back from holiday - going to Raro and Aitutaki in a couple of weeks for about a month.)
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby deeknow » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:19 pm

ZK-NGM left the country for good today following its retirement earlier in the year, another 300 bites the dust...
http://mrcaviation.blogspot.co.nz/2013/11/...300-zk-ngm.html
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby Ian Warren » Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:46 pm

deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Nov 21 2013,8:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ZK-NGM left the country for good today following its retirement earlier in the year, another 300 bites the dust...

ArrrrrBUST! ... !
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby HamiltonWest » Wed May 21, 2014 7:00 pm

HamiltonWest
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:15 pm
Posts: 4170
Location: HAMILTON NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Wed May 21, 2014 7:34 pm

Just a bloody damn shame .. another bean counter cockup , almost 50 years of the type in NZ sky's
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby omitchell » Wed May 21, 2014 8:24 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ May 21 2014,7:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just a bloody damn shame .. another bean counter cockup , almost 50 years of the type in NZ sky's


Don't worry Ian, the way the Airbus's are performing I think it's safe to say we will see some sort of 73X back in our Koru at some point...
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Wed May 21, 2014 8:47 pm

The ARBUST have become proven not be as stacked up to be what original spec's , corrosion found in wings and all sorts, why change a perfectly good wheel for a flat !
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby cowpatz » Wed May 21, 2014 9:52 pm

Allegiances aside the only real issue with the Airbus domestically is the slower turnaround times. This has had an affect on aircraft numbers.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby omitchell » Wed May 21, 2014 10:54 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ May 21 2014,9:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Allegiances aside the only real issue with the Airbus domestically is the slower turnaround times. This has had an affect on aircraft numbers.


And financial costs...
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby scon » Thu May 22, 2014 6:33 pm

I'll eat my hat if we get another 737. Lots of A320 bashers around, none that I know of have ever flown the 320.

Just bought another sim for the fleet, passengers seem to like them, I like them as a passenger. They seem to be making a good effort with OTP, front and rear boarding must help. The 10 that I have been on in the last 3 weeks have all been on time, although that doesn't give a great overall indication of OTP.

From what I understand they offer a significantly improved CASM, coupled with a combined type for TASPAC and Domestic should improve the bottom line I would imagine.

I hear people say ' this was a bean counters decision ', yes it was. Find me another 'end of the line' carrier which is going as well as our national carrier, take a look across the ditch? $140 million profit in the first half, that result is not achieved by a company that has lost the plot with its financial decisions.

90% of passengers couldn't tell the difference between an A320 or 737 let alone care what they fly on, what they care about, is price and product, the A320 works. One should not confuse a personal preference of the 737 or allegiance to a manufacture of aircraft as proof of a wrong decision or failing company direction. The 747 is soon to go, replaced by the 77W, which from my understanding from a piloting point of view in regard to performance, performs decidedly worse, yet finically, decidedly better .. yet Boeing to Boeing, no nay sayers.

As a kiwi and aviation fan, it will be sad to see the 737 go, truly it is. Would have loved the opportunity to fly it one day.
But aside from that .. the future looks good.
scon
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

PreviousNext

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests