by hasegawa » Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:52 am
Yes Ian, this is one of the points. Another is, that Boeing has not enough invested in the People at the Charleston plant.
Another problem is that they have (i have a problem with the English vokables) less time for the aircraft to manufacture. The security inspectors are under pressure and can not do the work as required. They have only signed that everything is allright, but it was not allright. Incomplete and damaged parts are build in the later controlled aircraft. They have sacrificed accuracy for deadlines. And this is all in all unacceptable. So for me Boeing is not the old Boeing Company that has build a lot of good, safe and solid aircraft. At the moment it semed, that we are very lucky, but let us see, how safe these plastic aircraft are in the daily reality and under the normal pressure. Nobody can test this under all circumstances and often enough the mankind has learnt the lessions only with casualtys... The point, that the Ex. Boss of the FAA, who signed the aircraft airworthy after the battery-failurs is now a Vice-director of Boeingis not inspiring confidence.
I dislike the Dreamliner and can only hope, that the A 350 with the same concept is safer and better.
Last edited by
hasegawa on Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:02 am, edited 1 time in total.