NZFF

by **HamiltonWest** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:57 am

Virgin Atlantic Boeing 747-400 Emergency Landing & Gear Failure
http://youtu.be/6xURMsneh9k

Virgin 747-400 Gear Failure & Emergency Landing
http://youtu.be/JoWS_SHe4gU

Virgin Atlantic plane landing scare at Gatwick airport
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/645381...gatwick-airport

by **NZ255** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:27 am

Damn that was pretty good. Looks like no.3 engine didn't even get a scratch.

by **Ian Warren** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:30 am

Now were Where the Thunderbird's, just for safety sake

by **Splitpin** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:52 pm

Well done that man .... but what a tough machine .

by **Charl** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:04 pm

It did end up listing somewhat to starboard, with one leg out.
I wonder if they were able to move (the remaining) fuel over to the left to try to counter that?

by **Ian Warren** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:11 pm

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Dec 30 2014,3:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I wonder if they were able to move (the remaining) fuel over to the left to try to counter that?

That would be interesting to find out .

by **cowpatz** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:52 pm

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Dec 30 2014,3:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It did end up listing somewhat to starboard, with one leg out.
I wonder if they were able to move (the remaining) fuel over to the left to try to counter that?

Nope. You just have to burn it off more from the 2 Starboard tanks. The 747 is certified to land with just either the body gear or wing gear extended. It is a tough well engineered bird.
He certainly tested it out on landing (both of them)

by **Ian Warren** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:55 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Dec 30 2014,6:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It is a tough well engineered bird.
He certainly tested it out on landing (both of them)

.. A well thought out plan , "pin a tail on it " and call it a Boeing 747

by **Splitpin** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 6:45 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Dec 30 2014,6:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nope. You just have to burn it off more from the 2 Starboard tanks. The 747 is certified to land with just either the body gear or wing gear extended. It is a tough well engineered bird.
He certainly tested it out on landing (both of them)

CP , may i ask why the engines were left running ? (once he stopped) or would they have been spooling down.

by **cowpatz** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:26 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Dec 30 2014,7:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
CP , may i ask why the engines were left running ? (once he stopped) or would they have been spooling down.

Probably waiting for a ground assessment before deciding a course of action. It may have been possible to taxy off onto a high speed taxiway for example and so clear the runway.

by **Charl** » Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:50 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Dec 30 2014,6:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nope. You just have to burn it off more from the 2 Starboard tanks. The 747 is certified to land with just either the body gear or wing gear extended. It is a tough well engineered bird.
He certainly tested it out on landing (both of them)

Yes that's what I was wondering: whether they'd go for an asymmetric fuel load on landing, by whatever means.
It certainly was no Greaser... what the heck, in the tabloid press he is a Hero, and everyone feels lucky and happy.

by **Lindstrim** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:39 am

Something that possibly won't have come up in a sim session?

I know ours can do blown tires and possibly one gear retractions.

by **Ian Warren** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:55 am

Lindstrim wrote:
QUOTE (Lindstrim @ Dec 31 2014,10:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Something that possibly won't have come up in a sim session?

I do wonder .... move the passengers to the other side of the aircraft ... that little extra weight

NZFF

Virgin 747 Emergency Landing Gear Failure

Who is online