100% ad-free

Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jan 9 2015,2:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I would go with the 250GB SSD for the OS and install FSX onto the 1TB DriveThanks. That is what I had in mind. I guess a 250GB SSD would not be big enough to house the OS and all the desired FSX programs.
Would FSX be much faster to access from the SSD.?CPU: Intel Core i5 760 @ 2.8GHz. Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX. RAM: Kingston Hyper X 8GB 1600mhz DDR3 Non ECC. SSD: Samsung 250GB. HDD: WD !TB.
GRAPHICS: Asus GTX460, Direct CU 1GB GDDR5 256bit video graphics card. PSU: Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 650W. CASE: Cooler Master Gladiator.
scaber wrote:QUOTE (scaber @ Jan 9 2015,2:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>If you are wanting to instal FSX on the SSD then I would go for a 500Gb one. MY FSX folder is currently at 165Gb and I know people who have quite a bit more than that - sorry CN you're on the light weight size here - but then again you are probably much more selective in what you have installed. My big ones are some photoreal sceneries (and rather more aircraft than I actually need) both of which seem to eat into things pretty quickly.Unfortunately a 500GB SDD is quite expensive at present. As a matter of interest, have you partitioned your 2TB drive or do you not think this is of any benefit.?
My FSX is on a separate WD black 2Tb drive which seems up to the task though I'm sure that a SSD installation would be faster loading than miine.CPU: Intel Core i5 760 @ 2.8GHz. Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX. RAM: Kingston Hyper X 8GB 1600mhz DDR3 Non ECC. SSD: Samsung 250GB. HDD: WD !TB.
GRAPHICS: Asus GTX460, Direct CU 1GB GDDR5 256bit video graphics card. PSU: Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 650W. CASE: Cooler Master Gladiator.
rocky289 wrote:QUOTE (rocky289 @ Jan 9 2015,3:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I was fortunate to get a couple of 250 SSD's at a reasonable price.That sounds ideal. Lucky you!!
Have win7 on one & FSX on the other.
Use a 500 GB hard drive for storage.
Boot up & load times are a lot faster.CPU: Intel Core i5 760 @ 2.8GHz. Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX. RAM: Kingston Hyper X 8GB 1600mhz DDR3 Non ECC. SSD: Samsung 250GB. HDD: WD !TB.
GRAPHICS: Asus GTX460, Direct CU 1GB GDDR5 256bit video graphics card. PSU: Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 650W. CASE: Cooler Master Gladiator.
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jan 9 2015,4:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The boot up times a quick but not much else is noticeable IMHO.
For me the loading time in FSX is far quicker.
Used to be up to 4 minutes, now 40 seconds..Last edited by NZ255 on Fri Jan 09, 2015 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.Nick
Pato wrote:QUOTE (Pato @ Jan 9 2015,3:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Unfortunately a 500GB SDD is quite expensive at present. As a matter of interest, have you partitioned your 2TB drive or do you not think this is of any benefit.?
Yes, I have partitioned the 2Tb into two partitions. Just make sure that you install FSX on the first partition for more rapid access times.![]()
|---------- Virtual Tour and Panoramic Photography ---------|
|-------------------- greg mckenzie, Christchurch -------------------|
scaber wrote:QUOTE (scaber @ Jan 9 2015,9:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yes, I have partitioned the 2Tb into two partitions. Just make sure that you install FSX on the first partition for more rapid access times.Thanks. Will do.Last edited by Pato on Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.CPU: Intel Core i5 760 @ 2.8GHz. Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX. RAM: Kingston Hyper X 8GB 1600mhz DDR3 Non ECC. SSD: Samsung 250GB. HDD: WD !TB.
GRAPHICS: Asus GTX460, Direct CU 1GB GDDR5 256bit video graphics card. PSU: Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 650W. CASE: Cooler Master Gladiator.
scaber wrote:QUOTE (scaber @ Jan 9 2015,9:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yes, I have partitioned the 2Tb into two partitions. Just make sure that you install FSX on the first partition for more rapid access times.
Why does putting FSX on the first partition make it any faster to access??
gdavies wrote:QUOTE (gdavies @ Jan 17 2015,6:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why does putting FSX on the first partition make it any faster to access??
The read heads don't have to move so far to access the data after reading the index file to find where they are located. Not very significant for small number of file reads but with FSX where there are thousands of files being read that can start to add up a bit.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/255224/how_...erformance.html![]()
|---------- Virtual Tour and Panoramic Photography ---------|
|-------------------- greg mckenzie, Christchurch -------------------|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests