TITANIC conspiracy

A forum for everything else that does not fit into the other categories

TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:56 am

I'm all for the Apollo missions , but this TITANIC conspiracy thing is Very very plausible I have one book here printed in 1997 showing the Titanic on the slipway with only 14 portholes on the bow, then beside it is another photo getting fitted out still with only three funnels but now has 16 portholes, I do have another book I lent out a the mo, which has a lot of Dr Robert Ballard's diving photo's and extra photo material, really is something that could be very believable .
There was a third ship in the class the was going to be called the Gigantic but renamed Britannica and that was sunk in the Mediterranean during WWI as a hospital ship heading the Dardanelles.
Watch on youtube.com
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Mar 20, 2016 12:17 pm

Another two photo's here , the Titanic with the 14 portholes and with a red and black hull at launch and the other almost fitted out, you can read Titanic on the side off the hull now with 16 portholes and the hull is now painted grey.
I'll scan the photos shortly, I want to check other books I have here, simply something I did not ask myself.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Mar 20, 2016 1:46 pm

Photo showing the Titanic on the stocks showing its name and 14 only portholes almost ready for launch.
Image
Image
Going in the water on launch, still in its black and red hull colour, 14 portholes.
Image
Suddenly a close up shows the name Titanic clearly but now with a grey hull.
Image
I do have 2 photo's showing the Olympic sliding down the slipway and her hull is white.
Image
I would say without a doubt the ships were changed , believe doco is factual or least dose show sheep
have been drape over peoples eyeballs ... wonder what James Carmeron is up to now TITANIC II :wink: .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Charl » Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:15 pm

Good conspiracy theories are hard to come by...
This one sounds more plausible than most, up to the point of the Titanic's (uniquely) enclosed promenade, to be seen resting on the bottom of the ocean!
But more interestingly... why did they make the narrator CGI?? :lol:
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Fozzer » Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:33 pm

Conspiracy...

...and I suspect that your really thought that Man had landed on the Moon in 1969, Ian!... :o ...!

I don't believe in anything, any more... :lol: ....!

You can fool most of the people....most of the time.... :wink2: ...!

Paul.... :sleepy:....!
User avatar
Fozzer
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:29 pm
Posts: 2428
Location: Hereford, Herefordshire, England

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:24 am

Charl wrote:Good conspiracy theories are hard to come by...
This one sounds more plausible than most, up to the point of the Titanic's (uniquely) enclosed promenade, to be seen resting on the bottom of the ocean!
But more interestingly... why did they make the narrator CGI?? :lol:

I got the book back this morning, I shows the Olympic in its black painted hull now with only 14 portholes, one primary mentioned was also the longitudinal beam in the wreck, this is a Goodie.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Mon Mar 21, 2016 9:55 am

Fozzer wrote:...and I suspect that your really thought that Man had landed on the Moon in 1969, Ian!... :o ...!

Well in an actual fact I do believe Neil and Buzz and the others walked on the moon, I also met Buzz in Wanaka, one person who is a specialist in that subject is Nick, he really has researched this , but I have never had any doubt.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Mon Mar 21, 2016 10:48 am

Here is the Olympic circa late 1912 entering Southhampton now wear its black hull paint but sporting 14 portholes, .... if you also notice the hull off the Titanic with the four fitting-out look how weather beaten and dirty is, for a brand new ship ... one has to remember coaling a ship it a very dirty task hence the reason they paint the hull black to hide the coal dust.
Image
On further reading the Olympic in Summer 1912, went in for another major refit which took six months to complete, more life boats added and further internal fittings, Still Very very Plausible considering time attitude of people, the very Victorian pompous attitude and the time of the period , we can't prove it but it makes for a huge 'possible conspiracy', they do it today to hide many things, or least not straight about answers, those days it would have been very easy to get away with as long as you had the money and connections.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Charl » Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:24 pm

Truth sure can be stranger than fiction... do yourself a favour and Google JP Morgan Jr.
Apart from funding the First World War ( seriously - he had sole supply of armament for Britain and France! When their money ran out he arranged a loan and took 1% of the lot as commission) he was a shareholder of White Star Line.
I'd believe almost any conspiracy about him.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Mon Mar 21, 2016 8:39 pm

Charl wrote:Truth sure can be stranger than fiction... do yourself a favour and Google JP Morgan Jr.
Apart from funding the First World War ( seriously - he had sole supply of armament for Britain and France! When their money ran out he arranged a loan and took 1% of the lot as commission) he was a shareholder of White Star Line.
I'd believe almost any conspiracy about him.

I'll check him out , again it was the era were the Rich were the better class , I was checking up on the judge at the court of inquiry and his other crony's... I love to get my hands on the radio details.

I never thought off something like this yet the details were in the three book showing the changes ... other point I picked on was the Titanic name also changed colour from the time off launch to the fitting out basin .. launch to first voyage its a gold colour .. fitting out it looks a rusty red.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:12 pm

One come to me yesterday, I told him of the find, the conspiracy theory, he works on cargo/container ships, I asked was this possible, forget the name changing and shape and design build and portholes, Gerard, said you can spot an iceberg at night even fogged in with a good moon! he said "at night they shine like diamonds" one thing pointed out and we had to have a chuckle .... who the hell was driving , the turn radius and distance , he said a lot of people have talked about this over the years but has been white washed out.

Before subject change to what I was doing, Gerald did say a good example was the 'Rena' on the reef and how companies hide the truth and today because of the media is to hard to hide the specifics, them said even the shipping lines today are very corrupt, P&O apparently one off the worst, all the details show it was he said it was deliberate, but it is history and well gone and done.

Another ship worked was the Steamer 'Holmdale' of the 'Canterbury Steam Shipping Company' mention there was many not sure, the ship was sold to another company and for insurance purpose say the cargo shifted in heavy seas to Norfolk Island ....
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Re: TITANIC conspiracy

Postby chopper_nut » Fri May 06, 2016 5:36 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
Fozzer wrote:...and I suspect that your really thought that Man had landed on the Moon in 1969, Ian!... :o ...!

Well in an actual fact I do believe Neil and Buzz and the others walked on the moon, I also met Buzz in Wanaka, one person who is a specialist in that subject is Nick, he really has researched this , but I have never had any doubt.


They did. Simple. In 45 years nobody in the aerospace industry has voiced any doubts. Only incompetent amateurs...
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests