NZFF

by **ZK-KAG** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:50 pm

I had to ask, and I just wanted to get a gauge as to how many A and B supporters there are out there... Feel free to add your abuse at either manufacturer, but please keep it clean

~ZK-KAG~

B)

by **Kelburn** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:54 pm

Boeing all the way man!
(Or to be specific 737-300!!)

by **ZKTOM** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:06 pm

Boeing are very good planes. A very trusted company. Airbuses are flown by computers virtually. Boeings are flown by pilots.

by **ZK-KAG** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:12 pm

I like the results already!!!

by **ZK-MAT** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:18 pm

I don't really care, but I like the look of the Airbuses though (hides). I compare Boeings to the old bedford school buses and Airbus' to a new luxury coach

by **ardypilot** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:55 pm

If it isn't Boeing, It isn't going!

by **scon** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:15 pm

Ahh the big question

BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING

by **ZK-KAG** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:18 pm

scon wrote: Ahh the big question

BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING BOEING

Ah yes but you are flying Grumman's!

But

to Boeing!

by **HardCorePawn** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:51 pm

If it isn't Boeing, It isn't going!

If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going!

I dont really like airbuses... they just look funny... the A340 has too many engines and the wings have this funny arch to them... and i just loathe the big fat pig aka. A380...

But then again, I'm not completely sold on the 777 either... and the 787 looks a bit weird as well...

To be brutally honest tho... I dont really care... as long as I get premium economy or business class <_<

by **towerguy** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:29 pm

Voted Boeing but don't forget MD or the company they took over DC. Some TRULY great aircraft came out of those stables.

and would you ever trust an aircraft made by a company in a place called "toulouse" or "TOO-LOOSE"?????

by **Jimmy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:47 am

hahahaha look at that, noone dares vote for airbus!

lol it had to come along some time, I think by now we all know the general opinnion around the fourm

I have cast my vote

But then again, I'm not completely sold on the 777 either... and the 787 looks a bit weird as well...

747-800 should be prety nice. I think the 787 looks kool but I don't like the look of the airbus gray flight deck that iv seen in a few pictures..

by **Naki** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:45 pm

I voted for either or - tend to like Airbus narrow bodies whilst my preference is Boeing for the wide bodies. I tend to like the more effecient aircraft in each class (ie 777, 787, A320). I guess the A380 is very effeicient but it is so darn ugly.

by **Brennanx** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:54 pm

I did both equal :plane:

I like airbuses and I like boeings :thumbup:

by **ZÃƒÂ¶ltuger** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:45 pm

towerguy wrote: Voted Boeing but don't forget MD or the company they took over DC. Some TRULY great aircraft came out of those stables.

if a little accident prone (DC-10)

ZKTOM wrote:Airbuses are flown by computers virtually. Boeings are flown by pilots.

I agree with this, ever try doing a barrel roll or a loop in an A321? you can't! I really don't like Airbus' tendancy to remove control from the pilot and giving it to a processor.

by **h290master** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:57 pm

BOEING!!!!

by **Brennanx** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:59 pm

I would rather have a plane that cant do loops and rolls than one that can.

by **Jimmy** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:18 pm

I would rather have a plane that cant do loops and rolls than one that can.

woudln't we all brennanx

I really don't like Airbus' tendancy to remove control from the pilot and giving it to a processor.

yeah, I once saw a program about a fatal acident in a A300, prety much the whole crash occured due to the aircrafts computers, if the pilots had sat back and didn't touch anythign it would have been alright and the aircraft woudl have got itself out of the spining stall, well the story went somethign like that.. :blink: