Products: FSX, Orbx NZSI, FTX Global, REX 4 + Overdrive, PMDG 747-400 X "Queen of the Skies" and several bottle of Steinlager...

100% ad-free


000rick000 wrote:QUOTE (000rick000 @ Apr 3 2014,7:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Far from Home!...FlyBE, QW AvroRJ 85, Departing CHCH
Rick,...stunning mate

Adrian Brausch wrote:QUOTE (Adrian Brausch @ Apr 7 2014,8:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>IL-76 by Ilya Kulikov (Monumentum), enroute to YSSY form Auckland,..
These are extremely impressive looking aircraft, A Superb Screen, I saw one on the ramp in Christchurch a few years back, I really was impressed !Roelio wrote:QUOTE (Roelio @ Apr 6 2014,3:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Her Majesty leaving Christchurch at sunset
Roelio , we had the luxury of one flying in and out off Christchurch over a week never quite reached the evening - more midday - but still a nice site to see
Ian Warren- NZFF Pro
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
- Posts: 41187
- Location: AREA 51
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Apr 8 2014,2:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Roelio , we had the luxury of one flying in and out off Christchurch over a week never quite reached the evening - more midday - but still a nice site to see
Well, I'm not an expert on Air NZ departure timesso let's say it's winter and the sun goes down early. And also assume that it is a warm winter, so there is no snow
Or, it's heavily delayedLast edited by Roelio on Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Roelio wrote:QUOTE (Roelio @ Apr 9 2014,4:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well, I'm not an expert on Air NZ departure timesso let's say it's winter and the sun goes down early. And also assume that it is a warm winter, so there is no snow
Or, it's heavily delayed
That specific aircraft I mentioned, he didn't no which way to go .. I caught him on Rwy20 then he stopped turned around between the gaps in the traffic and took off on Rwy02 , with that 'I can't decide which runway to use' within those hours, It would have been superb to see that 747 using Rwy29/11 ... now that would have been extraLast edited by Ian Warren on Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Apr 6 2014,5:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Define "clear" .... 100% fluffy free ? one little cb in the distance ? Big D , i need some boundaries here
SP, I was a bit worried about that too. A hunt around the 'Net for 'oktas' found lots of definitions from various sources - met offices, airport forecasts and suchlike - all consistently stating that, say, 'three oktas' meant there was enough cloud present to obscure three-eights of the visible sky, when viewed using a mirror marked off with a 16-square grid. I know RAF Weather bods looked up through a skylight which had eight panels, instead of down at a grid on a mirror.
The crucial point is that Clear Sky = 0 oktas, and Light Cloud = 1 okta.
So as I see it, anything less than 1 okta must be clear sky. So a modicum of fluffy things - as seen in that whale of an entry I posted - must be legit.
Unfortunately, it's not me that runs the comp; Doug's decision is final.![]()
ATB
MikeMikeW
'Propliner' is actually short for 'Proper airliner, with big rumbly radials'
emfrat wrote:QUOTE (emfrat @ Apr 9 2014,10:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I was a bit worried about that too.
I hired an aircraft on a clear day out of Ashburton, clear it is but at 5000 ft it is not, another flight, early morning out off Wigram to Ashburton it was... a Clear Day
emfrat wrote:QUOTE (emfrat @ Apr 9 2014,9:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>SP, I was a bit worried about that too. A hunt around the 'Net for 'oktas' found lots of definitions from various sources - met offices, airport forecasts and suchlike - all consistently stating that, say, 'three oktas' meant there was enough cloud present to obscure three-eights of the visible sky, when viewed using a mirror marked off with a 16-square grid. I know RAF Weather bods looked up through a skylight which had eight panels, instead of down at a grid on a mirror.
The crucial point is that Clear Sky = 0 oktas, and Light Cloud = 1 okta.
So as I see it, anything less than 1 okta must be clear sky. So a modicum of fluffy things - as seen in that whale of an entry I posted - must be legit.
Unfortunately, it's not me that runs the comp; Doug's decision is final.![]()
ATB
Mike
Right .....i will assume that big D means no fluff . Great reply by the way Mike .
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Apr 10 2014,10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Right .....i will assume that big D means no fluff . Great reply by the way Mike .
It is OK if one or two small fluff's drift into your clear day image but the part of NZ that you have in the background must be clearly visible

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests