New approach for controversial Auckland plane route

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby Splitpin » Sat May 31, 2014 9:58 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ May 31 2014,2:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A Choo Choo .. never .. I not complain ... I race out saying to myself another earthquake ! ohmy.gif


Me as well , those 20+ coal trains heading to the coast .... feels like a 3.5 ... or maybe the ground has changed under my house , and i feel more now.
Have to be honest .... when i get a chance to sleep in , the noise from the rubbish trucks outside wakes me up real fast .... "is it a quake" .... life has changed down here .... and its not nice.
I know the rest of NZ is thinking "get over it" .... but its hard to get over it . My place was trashed in the first one , and munted (broken in half) in the next one ..... wow , still seems to be a raw nerve sorry.
Always on edge ... packed and ready to run , a sad way to live , but for now its how it is .... now, how did we get here ? this is a flightsim forum .
Last edited by Splitpin on Sat May 31, 2014 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 01, 2014 9:50 am

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ May 31 2014,10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Me as well , those 20+ coal trains heading to the coast .... feels like a 3.5 ... or maybe the ground has changed under my house , and i feel more now.

I do wonder how of these people complain and may even live on a busy road ... before the street I live in here was modified every boy duffess with a Milo can on the back off his exhaust just to make a noise, what about those trucks with engine brakes ..
QUOTE
Always on edge ... packed and ready to run , a sad way to live , but for now its how it is .... now, how did we get here ? this is a flightsim forum .[/quote]
Aeroplane noise ..... course the the home made turbulence .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby ardypilot » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:44 am

Not sure if those smart approaches were published in the AIP whilst active, but have been living under the BASIV6A and ARADI6A STAR for the majority of the last 10 years and haven't noticed too much of a change in air traffic.

On an unrelated subject, I did note EK412 inbound on the ARADI6A yesterday lunchtime, whilst operating around the LOSGA position outside of controlled airspace at 2500ft. The arrival states to be at or above 5000ft at this point but I swear it looked less than 1000ft above me. Might have just been the clear weather and giant scale of the A380 that made it appear closer! blink.gif
Last edited by ardypilot on Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby omitchell » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:48 am

ardypilot wrote:
QUOTE (ardypilot @ Jun 1 2014,11:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not sure if those smart approaches were published in the AIP whilst active, but have been living under the BASIV6A and ARADI6A STAR for the majority of the last 10 years and haven't noticed too much of a change in air traffic.

On an unrelated subject, I did note EK412 inbound on the ARADI6A yesterday lunchtime, whilst operating around the LOSGA position outside of controlled airspace at 2500ft. The arrival states to be at or above 5000ft at this point but I swear it looked less than 1000ft above me. Might have just been the clear weather and giant scale of the A380 that made it appear closer! blink.gif


And the other Emirates flight. Someone complained about them..
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby ardypilot » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:55 am

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Jun 1 2014,11:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Someone complained about them..

They did?
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby omitchell » Sun Jun 01, 2014 12:07 pm

ardypilot wrote:
QUOTE (ardypilot @ Jun 1 2014,11:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They did?


Yup
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:12 pm

I would love to meet some off these people and really try and understand the contents of their brain cases ... or better still listen to some off those phone calls so we call can have a laugh , don't spose ya allowed to replay them .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby NZ255 » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:14 pm

emfrat wrote:
QUOTE (emfrat @ May 31 2014,4:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But if the routes shown in the graphic were mirrored to the south, wouldn't they work just as well? unsure.gif

I was thinking the same thing, can anyone comment on this?

Edit: actually thinking about this, most slower domestic traffic comes from the south, and the rnp equipped aircraft flying this approach would be coming from the north, or as for the case of 320s from oz, at least faster. I guess the north south separation is needed to land everything on time?
Last edited by NZ255 on Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby NZ255 » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:20 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 1 2014,1:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would love to meet some off these people and really try and understand the contents of their brain cases ... or better still listen to some off those phone calls so we call can have a laugh , don't spose ya allowed to replay them .

Oh yeah, I'd love to talk to the individual who logged 350 complaints after trial ended
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby omitchell » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:50 pm

NZ255 wrote:
QUOTE (NZ255 @ Jun 1 2014,1:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh yeah, I'd love to talk to the individual who logged 350 complaints after trial ended


I'm still taking them lol
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby NZ255 » Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:56 pm

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Jun 1 2014,1:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm still taking them lol

Are you allowed to tell them it has ended smile.gif
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby cowpatz » Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:44 pm

emfrat wrote:
QUOTE (emfrat @ May 31 2014,4:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Noooo! Not the Snuffleupagus! ohmy.gif

Seriously though, is there any reason for NZAA SIDS and STARS to cross the central city at all? Not being a local, I could be missing something, but if the routes shown in the graphic were mirrored to the south, wouldn't they work just as well?


The problem here is that International arrivals and departures would be mixing it up with Domestic arrivals and departures and the efficiencies would be lost. It would require altitude hold downs and/or extra vectoring. All this adds to increased controller workload and extra fuel consumed during the hold down or extra track mileage due to vectoring. There is nothing at all wrong with the SMART approaches. They could be fine tuned a little possibly. Maintaining the conventional STAR arrivals would allow a bit of a mix with the SMARTs (as during the trial) and so share around any "noise".
Departures from 05R and 23L are already required to essentially climb runway heading until 3000ft before a turn to the North so by the time they are anywhere near the city they would be in excess of 4000 to 5000 ft.

As can be seen in the report most of the submitters are regular whingers and even then they are complaining about noise that is not even related to the SMART approaches.
Just wait until the second runway gets underway...then the phones will ring hot.
Last edited by cowpatz on Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:10 pm

Like most that visit here, my ears and theirs pick up the very slight moan or whine and rumble (music to our ears), we all generally go racing out with scanners and cameras in hand and enjoy the view.

Maybe these people should get a stamp ticket .. one complaint and if you require to fly somewhere - they have to wait a six month period .. you are not allowed to fly .. two complaints, a year and so on
.. that'll sort em .. three complaints and you simply are not allowed to use the service, domestic or international.

Ian's Aviation Ideas (IAI) sounds more formal ...
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Jun 01, 2014 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby HamiltonWest » Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:11 pm

Last edited by HamiltonWest on Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HamiltonWest
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:15 pm
Posts: 4170
Location: HAMILTON NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:53 pm

Obviously IAI 's did not work .. "after a public outcry about noise. " ... some people really get there panties in a twist rolleyes.gif ... wonder how many boy racers ... All hang on , whata bout the garbage truck on collection days ..
Last edited by Ian Warren on Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby omitchell » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:17 am

Still taking complaints, one guy complains about EVERY flight departing or arriving into Auckland, even the southbound ones which go nowhere near his house lol
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:22 am

Some people really need to get a life .... least in this case, maybe a head doctor.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby cowpatz » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:39 pm

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Dec 18 2014,9:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Still taking complaints, one guy complains about EVERY flight departing or arriving into Auckland, even the southbound ones which go nowhere near his house lol


That's when the connection should be broken. He's obviously a moron.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby NZ255 » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:16 pm

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Dec 18 2014,10:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Still taking complaints, one guy complains about EVERY flight departing or arriving into Auckland, even the southbound ones which go nowhere near his house lol

He's probably made his complaints all void by reporting everything. What an idiot.
Last edited by NZ255 on Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby chopper_nut » Thu Dec 18, 2014 6:22 pm

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Dec 17 2014,10:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Still taking complaints, one guy complains about EVERY flight departing or arriving into Auckland, even the southbound ones which go nowhere near his house lol


When I worked at NZWN we had complaints all the time about diggers and trucks when we were doing night work on the RESA. They also complained when Air Nelson did engine tests on the SAABs after about 10 at night. I'm convinced these people need to be shot.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

PreviousNext

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests